Tuesday 24 February 2009

Lenin's Tomb: Censored Tales From The Crypt

Two responses to articles appearing on the far-left blog: Lenin's Tomb. I hasten to add that Lenin, like his historical namesake, will not tolerate any views significantly different from his own; my posts are usually removed within minutes.

Firstly, in response to:
The more things change, the more New Labour stays the same posted by lenin (Tuesday, February 24, 2009).

I wrote:

"Latte-moustached" Secretary of State for Business Peter Mandelson. Is this some gross homophobic joke? I hope not.

Well, as for haughtiness, arrogance and elitism, indeed, I can see it in bucket loads here. For a start, how about trying to see if the average British working-class person thinks that the campaign "British jobs for British workers" is "bollocks". I suggest that you walk into any working man's club, and put this sentiment to them. What's that you say? It's because, unlike yourself, they don't understand the issues (refer to the first sentence in this paragraph).

Pseudo-populism (now there's an elitist term to bamboozle the working classes) if it has any intelligible meaning as a term it is something I would associate with the Socialist Workers' (sic) Party. This unelectable party claims to champion the workers, but in reality its membership comprises mainly elitist know-alls or snotty-nosed student know-nowts who despise Britain on so many levels and never miss an opportunity to side with those who wish us ill.

Secondly, in response to
Streets of Rage posted by lenin (Monday, February 23, 2009).

In particular, to the post
"Encouraging the BNP - up to a point - and encouraging Islamophobia - again, at least up to a point - is clearly part of the ruling-class game plan."
Faust | Homepage | 24 Feb, 17:27 | #

I wrote:

Faust, your moniker is quite apposite given that you have intellectually entered into a compact with devilish Islamic extremism.

As for encouraging Islamophobia (the stupidest, nay the most irritating word in the far-left's voluminous but ultimately vacuous lexicon) would that include banning the good Mr. Wilders from entering the country to show his film?

And now that you've got me going, and because I'm something of a pedant, I'd like you to tell me what is the definition of "Islamophobia", giving me a sense of what this word means other than a direct transliteration of its two component parts. Then when you have done that, could you please tell a simpleton like myself why there is no such thing as "Hinduphobia", "Buddhistphobia", "Zoroastrianophobia", "Judao-phobia" (aka anti-Semitism, something quite a few people here feel even some Quisling anti-Israeli Jews themselves) or even "Christianophobia". But hang on a moment, I've tripped over my own argument because one could actually apply these terms to much of the Islamic world. Funny enough, only last night I was speaking to a Hindu colleague from Malaysia who told me of the "Hinduphobia" that exists in Islamic Malaysia. Now I know that you're going to say that an "Islamophobe" is actually someone who dares to point out what I have just said, n'cest pas?

No comments:

Post a Comment